John Shore

Archive for the ‘relationships’ Category

Wondering If He’s Mr. Right? Then He’s Not.

In Health, HowTo, relationships on August 2, 2008 at 4:16 am

 

Wondering whether or not someone is Mr. Right means he’s not. It really is exactly that simple. When you’ve met or gotten to know Mr. Right, he’ll be so Mr. Exactly  Right that you’ll know it like a lightening bolt to your chest. You’ll no sooner be able to wonder whether or not he’s Mr. Right then you’d wonder, standing out in the rain, whether or not you’re getting wet.

You’ll know. (And this is all true for men wondering about Miss Right, too.) In love—as in virtually everything—listen to your heart. Sure, it’s a doe-eyed cliche. But it’s true. Your heart knows. Your brain will do as brains do, and kick in with all kinds of noise and nonsense. But listening to your brain about such things is like listening to Bozo about blending in. Forget it. When considering if a certain someone is the certain someone, kick in with the only evaluative faculties that matter in such matters (or any matters, really): Your instincts.

It’s like with God. Think about God, and you get about nowhere. Feel  God, and he’s on you like yellow on mustard.

Think about whether you’re in love with someone, and good luck. Feel  whether you are, and you’ll know it like you know your name.

Then all that’s left is to obey what you’ve learned, to do what you know is right. And therein so often, of course, lies the rub.

 

Related posts: God Doesn’t Care If You’re Married or Not; You! Get Married! Now!; Looking for Mr. Right? You’re Missing the Point, Missy; Six Tests to Determine If He’s Mr. Right; To Single Women: Men. Don’t. Change.; Surprise (Or Not!)! Men Are SpoiledTop 10 Tips for Becoming an Ideal Husband; What’s In A Word: The Truth Behind Men’s Personal Ads.

 

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to Ma.gnoliaAdd to TechnoratiAdd to FurlAdd to Newsvine

More On Amy-DaughterOfTheKing

In Christianity, Family, Marriage, relationships on December 18, 2007 at 8:52 am

Okay, so to be clear (concerning the assertion in comment #12 on my last post that I “promote” divorce): Claiming to be “for” or “against” divorce is like claiming to be for or against weather. It depends on the weather. In principle, I’m extremely against divorce; I basically hate it, and grieve, whenever I even hear about a divorce. In reality, I certainly understand how divorce is sometimes the neccessary, best option.

I have nothing but sympathy for Amy, as I do for anyone who is suffering. Believe me: With all my heart I’m on Amy’s side.

Also–again, just to be clear–I never advised Amy to just “walk away” from her marriage. That’s just not anything I actually wrote.

Here’s something I did write in the comments section in the original post (it’s comment #11): 

“By the way–just for the record and all–I certainly understand the way so many women really are victims of their husbands. And I understand how easy it is for a woman–especially a woman with children–to essentially become trapped in a bad relationship with a man. As I’ve said elsewhere on this blog, my wife works for an organization that basically saves victims of domestic violence. And I’ve worked in shelters for such places myself. I’m very familiar with the whole … universe of domestic violence.

“Women trapped in bad relationships have a whole bunch of stuff they need to do. One of those things is to learn to take responsibility for the role they played in arriving where they’re at. I was just meaning, here, to Amy, to emphasize that particular aspect of her healing challenge. I know it’s not the only thing she needs to do; it’s just the one I chose to emphasize.”

So, there’s …. that stuff I also said.

Anyway, right: Relationships are difficult. I actually think they’re the most challenging and important thing any of us ever do in life. So of course I’m sympathetic to the challenges Amy is facing. Okay? (And I really am a Christian. Promise. [I can't believe how often it happens that the first thing a Christian says to you if they taken exception to something you've said is that you're not really a Christian. It's just bizarre. And exceptionally offensive, of course. Which I'm sure is the primary intent in saying something like that. So many people seem like they just live to be angry and fight, yes?])

Why I Prefer Not to Give Advice to Women with Jerk Husbands

In Christianity, Family, Marriage, relationships on December 17, 2007 at 10:17 am

A while ago I wrote a post entitled, “Surprise (Or Not!) Men Are Spoiled!” in which I made the case that it’s natural enough for men to be spoiled and generally feel entitled. At the end of that piece I promised to write a follow-up piece that would address the question of what a woman can do with the fact that her man is spoiled.

Afterwards, I thought about what I would actually say to women who are involved with, engaged or married to men who are spoiled or clearly feel too entitled. Then I thought I wouldn’t write that piece after all.

Whoo-hoo! It’s good to be King of Your Blogmain.

But now, a month after the fact, a woman has left a comment on “Surprise (Or Not!) Men Are Spoiled!” in which she relates her ongoing struggle to act in a loving enough way to satisfy her husband. “I give and I give,” she writes, “and I get overwhelmed. I can usually go to God for more energy to keep giving, however when my husband comes to me and says basically, ‘the job your doing is still not good enough, ’ I break down …. I really, really need the next article, John!!!”

And there it is: Three exclamation points!!!

So now I’m stuck. I have to respond. That poor woman!

Do let me just start off, however, by saying (too quickly, I know, and too abruptly—but what else can one do in a blog?) that the natural and true sympathy I have for “Amy-DaughterOfTheKing” tends to be pretty darn mitigated by the fact that, after all, she married the guy. Not to be obnoxious—and I know this can’t help but come of as exactly that—but it kind of drives me crazy when a person chooses to get into a relationship with someone who isn’t capable of maintaining a decent, loving relationship, and then complains because they’re in a relationship with someone who isn’t capable of maintaining a decent, loving relationship. To such people I always want to say, “But did you not know this person before you married them? If so, why did you marry them ? If not, why did you get married to someone you didn’t know very well?” (And then what you often hear is, “But he [or she] changed!”  Which is the same as saying, “Throughout our courtship the character qualities that now dominate my partner’s personality were in no way evident.” Which I just never quite understand as entirely really that feasible.)

And, effectively enough, this brings me to both of the big reasons I don’t actually want to give relationship advice to this woman, or any other woman in a situation similar to hers. First, I lack subtley on these matters; I am a complete relationship Nazi. I think everyone in a committed relationship should either start acting like the other person is more interesting to them than anything else in the world and live their lives as if they want to be worthy of the greatness of their partner, or get out of that relationship, and stop dragging the universe down with their . . . uncommitted ambiguity.

See? Entirely too Nazi-like. I mean, I think what I’ve said is true, but … but I understand that people tend to think stuff is a lot more complicated than that. Which of course it is. Except that it really isn’t. But people think it is. And that’s good enough for me.

Anyhoo, the second Big Reason I’m not too keen on giving relationship advice via this blog is that this blog is read by a lot of Christians. A fair number of them are Christian conservatives. I love Christian conservatives. I also love Christian liberals.

Basically, if you believe in the reality of the risen Christ, you and I are friends.

That said, though, you know how sometimes, in certain circles, people can use the Bible to basically impress upon women that it’s sort of their job in life to be “subservient” to their husbands? And you know how sometimes — not usually, of course, and certainly not by anyone with a normal, healthy understanding of what the Bible says about marital relationships — that whole “Women! Submit to your man!” thing can work to keep women in marriages that they really shouldn’t be in?

Well, so do I. So the other big reason I’m disinclined to offer Marriage Advice in this blog is because I know that if I do so I’ll run smack into a whole bunch of people’s passion about what they think the Bible says about this, that, and everything else in the world.

And within the vaporous, murky swamp of that conversation lie too many quicksand traps and snapping alligators for li’l ol’ me.

You see what I mean: I’m afraid that too much of the advice I’d give to Ms. Amy-DaughterOfTheKing would be taken by too many people as being un-Biblical. And then those people, I know, would be moved to write me and say and imply terrible things about me. And it’s extremely unpleasant to be told you’re not really a Christian. Believe me, this is something I know about. (And you would too, if you’d ever written a book for Christians called, I’m OK — You’re Not: The Message We’re Sending Nonbeleivers, and Why We Should Stop.Talk about … discovering the ugly underbelly of people who claim the Prince of Peace as their savior. Yikers.)

And I don’t want that kind of unpleasantness in my life right now. It’s Christmas!

Ahh … Christmas. Just feel the … weight going on, actually. But that’s really a whole other concern.

Anyway, Amy, I’m sorry, but I can’t help you. That’s the bad news. The good news is that I couldn’t have helped you anyway. And the really good news is that you already know that. Let’s face it, Amy: You already know everything you need to know about what you should do to make yourself peaceful and happy. You just have to do what you know you should. And, of course, it’s in the gap between what we know and what we do that all of the world’s troubles lie.

Surprise (Or Not)! Men Are Spoiled!

In Family, relationships on November 21, 2007 at 7:46 am

Lately I’ve had reason to understand (via Six Tests to Determine If He’s Mr. Right and To Single Women: Men. Don’t. Change) that women find men as mysterious as I know men find women. That this is true comes as a bit of surprise to me. I always thought that trying to figure out a man was like trying to figure out a banana. (Wait. Yellow; delicious for awhile; ultimately becomes something slimy that causes people to trip and fall. So, that metaphor won’t do. No, it won’t. It won’t! Stop it!)

So. Men. Let’s think about them/us.

Okay, so here’s one thing about men that I think women sometimes fail to understand: Men are really, really spoiled.

Hey, it’s not like we like being spoiled. It’s actually quite awful, because so often it amounts to the truth that we’re almost congenitally incapable of being satisfied. We always want more, different, bigger, better. What is is never enough for us. You try having your cake and eating it all the time. It’s exhausting.

There are four Humongous Reasons that we manly types tend to be more spoiled than … okay, fine: last month’s bananas: The world, hormones, parents, and women generally. Let’s look real quick at why/how each of those four conspires to make every man in the world feel that, when push comes to shove, he is the center of the known universe.

The World  As you may be aware, humans are the dominant species on our planet. (Yes, dolphins are swimming Einsteins and make perfectly adequate TV stars. But only humans can make pizza and operate blimps. So we win.) Males are the bigger and stronger of the two basic models in which humans come. Which means male humans live at the very tippy-tippy top of the food chain. We’re Number One! And we feel that being number one entitles us to … well, have whatever we want, whenever we want, however we want. It’s not a pretty thing — and it’s unlikely that for any given guy it’s even a conscious thing. But it’s there. Being a guy means inheriting the emotional legacy that comes with knowing that since time immemorial Your Specific Kind, through sheer physical prowess, has utterly dominated the only world humans have ever known. That means something to a guy. It means that, just by virtue of being a guy, he’s more entitled than the King of England. (Hey, hey! No queen jokes!)

Hormones  Scientists have long been aware of the fact that the introduction of testosterone into the bloodstream invariably transforms perfectly normal people into people who enjoy World Wide Wrestling and smashing cans on their foreheads. Sadly, scientists don’t know what to do about the effects of testosterone – and, being mostly men, don’t much care. We enjoy producing testosterone, is why. Testosterone is fun; it’ s fun having hair on your back and just knowingyou could have been a pro athlete. Testosterone is what allows a man to do important things, like stare at a car engine with a bunch of other men and pretend he knows a carburetor from a blender. Without testosterone, a man grunting appreciatively at a car engine would have to break right down and ask for a hug. What fun is that? (Besides, hugging wrinkles your clothes.) The ugly side of testosterone, though, is that it makes you physically and emotionally aggressive. And the whole point of being aggressive is that you want something — and you want whatever you want now. No matter how we manage to mitigate it through Proper Socialization Skills and Not Wanting To Get Arrested, at a basic, hormonallevel men are driven to want, want, and want some more. And being driven by your wants is the very definition of spoiled. Now send me money so I can buy stuff.

Parents  I would be the last person on earth to suggest this, but I’ve heard it’s just possible that, in some very select instances, some mothers tend to spoil their sons (if for no other reason than that they love them and want them to have everything they want), and that some fathers also spoil their sons, because (being men) it’s difficult for them notto see their sons primarily as Mini-Thems. But those could just be rumors. I could do the research to find out for sure, but I don’t want to because I’m hungry and want someone to feed me now. And besides, my thinking something is true is just the same as it being true. So there.

Women Women do tend to spoil their men. Women by nature nurture; men by nature enjoy being nurtured (while, of course, pretending we don’t). Women are passive and receptive; men are Action Oriented and …. givers. The bottom line? A lot of women, for a lot of reasons, spoil their men. And all men know it. And they like it. And they want it to happen to them, too. Most can’t imagine why it wouldn’t.

Anyway, of course these are all gross (and even offensive, I know) simplifications of necessarily complex innerpersonal dynamics.

Still. It’s been my humble experience that some or even a lot of women just do not get men. And one of the things they don’t get about men is that men are deeply spoiled. Or, rather, women get that men are spoiled (it’s not like we ever try to hide it or anything, is it?) — they just don’t get why men are spoiled.

So that’s why: Our relationship to the world, our parents, and women generally — that, plus Hormones Gone Wild – tend to make we men feel, in our very bones, like … like there’s a reason that both we and the King of the Beasts have truly outstanding hair, and enjoy having meals brought to them by women.

No, but you know what I mean. This is, still, a man’s world. And men know it. And it makes them feel that it should be a man’s world.

And that sense of entitlement can be the cause of a whooooooole lot of trouble. As you know. As we all know, whether we admit it or not.

Next time: What a woman can do about the fact that her man is spoiled.

Six Tests To Determine If He’s Mr. Right

In Family, Marriage, relationships on November 12, 2007 at 9:41 am

By way of comments to my last post, To Single Women: Men Don’t Change, I heard from a considerable number of women who basically got burned in relationships by guys who turned out to be less Prince Charming than … Burpy, the Village Dolt.

So that got me thinking about what women might be able to do in order to discover what their potential life-mate is really made of, who the man behind the Dating Curtain really is. So then I thought of these six tests a woman can use to discover whether or not the man you’re dating is Mr. Right, or … Mr. Lite. (No! Mr. Blight! No—Mr. Mite! Mr. Plight! No, no: Mr. Trite!! Okay, moving on. Sorry. I have some sort of … rhyming dysfunction.)

The Mr. Right Test #1: Get into real knock-down, drag-out fight with him
You can tell just about everything you need to know about a person by the way they fight. You simply do not know someone until you’ve had a fight with them. My wife and I have saying: A relationship is only as good as its first fight. People go crazy when they fight; what you want to know about your man is how crazy does he go, and how fast—and how much time he spends in Crazyland once he’s gone there. If in the heat of a real argument your man does a pretty good job of sticking to the point, or tends to ratchet the hostility down, or if he actually listens to the things you’re saying, then that’s a beautiful sign. But if he goes vicious, or starts attacking you personally by going after weaknesses that in love you’ve shared with him before, or (God forbid) gets in any way physical, that, too is a sign. A “Wrong Way” sign.

The Mr. Right Test #2: Go on a cross-country drive with him
People are pretty good at keeping their stuff together for predetermined lengths of time. But you spend two weeks with someone in a car, and it’s like dragging Dracula outside at high noon: Who they really are becomes very clear. On a long road trip, there’s nowhere for a man to hide. Sooner or later his smooth and yummy outer layer will wear off, and his inner chewy nuttiness will be revealed. Plus, a lot of unexpected stuff happens on a road trip: You get lost, a tire blows, the campsite doesn’t hold your reservation, etc. Anyone does well when things are going well; a road trip is sure to show you how your man reacts when things go like they always go in life, which is contrary to plans.

The Mr. Right Test #3: Have him care for you when you’re really sick
One (emphasize: one) of the reasons men love women so much is because women are just so darn pretty. Well, get ugly around your man for a change, and see how that works for you. Get biologically ugly: sneeze a lot, and wipe your nose on your sleeve—no, on his!—and cough like you’re trying to turn yourself inside out, and keep your hair all matted-up and funky, and just … exude Maximum Grossness. (Well, maybe not maximum grossness. No need to get arrested or anything.) How does he behave while you’re practically croaking on your couch? Is he patient, sympathetic, loving, attentive? Or does he (eventually) act like you being sick is really a drag that he wishes you’d stop? The former, of course, is great; the latter could make for one ceremony-wrecking flashback when the officiate at your wedding says the part about “in sickness and in health.” Knowing Our Kind, it’s safe to guess that your man has already shown you how ready he is to at a moment’s notice play the role of your father. That’s cool—or whatever. But what you also need to know from him is how willing he is to step up, when you need it, and assume the role of loving mother.

The Mr. Right Test #4: Watch him around other women
For many reasons we won’t here delve into (socialization, hormones, insecurity, nature, the desire to confirm that they’re as irresistable as they think they are), men flirt. Cool enough; that’s probably how you were attracted to your man in the first place. But once you and he have committed to being together exclusively, the only message your man ever needs to be sending any other woman is ”I’m Sure You’re Very Cute, But Not to Me.” Next time the two of you attend a party, separate from him, and then watch him while he’s in Solo Socializing mode. If you see him consistently not flirting with batting-eyed beauties, fantastic. If you do see him turning on his Mr. Spectacular show, don’t panic. At some point after the party, though, do talk to him—and for real. Tell him how his flirting with other girls hurts your feelings, and—worse, maybe—how it does makes you look like a fool. If he sees and understands the truth of that, and so agrees to never flirt again, that’s great: relationships are about honing and smoothing. But if, knowing how flirting does and must make you feel, he continues to flirt with other women, then he’s being very clear about not only who he is, but about whom he expects you to be.

The Mr. Right Test #5: Watch how he treats service personnel
Waiters, busboys, doormen, janitors, maids, parking attendants, delivery people, store clerks … a man’s character is revealed by how he treats such people in his life. If towards service personnel or those beneath him professionally your man is brusque, dismissive, or in even the slightest way condescending, then as sure as sharks bite he’s going to start treating you that way, too. It’s just not possible for a man who doesn’t treat everyone with respect to respect you. It’s a symptom of a problem he has that you’re not going to be able to fix. Get out right away, or go down trying.

The Mr. Right Test #6: Watch how he loses
Everyone wins well: in victory, everyone is gracious, magnanimous, humble, sweet, etc. How a guy loses, however, tells you who he is. Be with your man sometime when he loses a game of some sort that he wanted or expected to win. (Bonus points if you’re the one who beats him.) Watch very carefully how he responds to defeat. A real winner knows it’s about remaining a winner, no matter the score.

 

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to Ma.gnoliaAdd to TechnoratiAdd to FurlAdd to Newsvine

To Single Women: Men. Don’t. Change.

In Family, Marriage, relationships on November 7, 2007 at 7:56 am

If you’re a single woman, can you think of anyone from whom you’d be better off taking relationship advice than a middle-aged man you don’t know from Adam?

You can’t? Me neither! Great!

So here’s what I’m thinking: Being a guy means I know guys. And there’s one critically true thing about guys that all women learn sooner or later–and that you should definitely learn sooner, which is where I come in. And that truth is that men don’t change. You cannot change a man.

Anything that you say or do in hopes of changing a man is positively destined to fail.

If you’re thinking about marrying a man, realize now that he is who he’s going to be. If there are things about your potential life-mate that you don’t like — little habits, personality quirks, major behavior tendancies — you need to ask yourself whether or not you can live with those things. If the answer’s no, then move on to Bachelor Number Three, because Bachelor Number One isn’t your guy.

You need to find a man you love exactly as he is.

Which can seem tricky, because who is perfect?

But here’s the thing about that. Relative to whatever it is about any given guy that you think is a problem, ask yourself this question: Is that thing a matter of values, or taste? If he’s behaving in a way that runs contrary to your values, then that’s a serious issue. But if it’s only a matter of taste–of preference, of just, when it comes right down to it, of him doing things differently than you do – then that’s a whole other deal. That’s something you need to think about in a different way than you do things he’s doing or saying that are incompatible with your core life values.

A value difference? That could be a deal breaker. A style difference? That probably shouldn’t be.

For instance, let’s say you love a guy, but don’t like the fact that he rides a motorcycle. Is his riding a motorcycle a value issue? If not (and it doesn’t seem to be: knowing a man rides a motorcycle tells you nothing about his character), then you need to decide whether or not you’re okay with him riding a motorcycle. Because you’re in love with a man who does ride a motorcycle. That’s who he is. There isn’t a different man inside of the man you love who doesn’t ride a motorcycle, a man that you can somehow get to replace the man you know.

Your man rides a motorcycle. And though it sounds harsh to say, insofar as his riding a motorcycle is a problem, it’s your problem, not his. There’s simply nothing you can do to change the fact that he rides a motorcycle. You need to either be okay with his riding a motorcycle, or you have to say it’s too much, and be ready to leave him over it.

The choice you can’t make, though — or can, of course, but really, really shouldn’t make – is try to change what is your problem into his problem by complaining about it, or trying to make him feel guilty about it, or (even) crying about it. Sure, at the time you do those things a guy may respond to the emotionality of the moment by saying (and perhaps even believing) that he will change — but he won’t. Because once the drama has cleared, something inside of him (which he may not even consciously register) is going to reassert itself, and begin telling him that you don’t actually have a right to tell him who and how he should be. And that’s going to put him right back on the path he was on when you first met him, the one he’s been on all his life.

What so often happens, of course, is that after you’ve made a Big Point of trying to change your man, he’ll come to think: “Hmm. [Your name here] doesn’t like me riding a motorcycle. But I’ve always ridden a motorcycle; I love riding a motorcycle. I have no choice but to keep the fact that I ride a motorcycle away from [you]. That way she’ll be happy, and I’ll get to keep being myself. I certainly don’t like deceiving her, but what choice has she left me? I love her, and want her to be happy. She’s made it clear that the only way she’s going to be happy is to believe that I don’t ride a motorcycle. So I can’t let her know I do. It’s not so much that I’ll be lying to her; I just won’t be telling her something she’s told me she’d rather not know anyway. Cool. That works. Are we out of ham?”

And there you’ll be, stuck in that nasty little loop so many couples do get stuck in, where the woman’s either constantly nagging at her man to stop doing something he keeps doing anyway, or is sometimes being deeply upset at discovering that her man’s been lying to her about something he’s been doing all along that he’s not “supposed” to be doing at all. You know how that resentment-acting out cycle goes. Everyone does; we’ve all seen or lived it. It’s awful.

Avoid it now by realizing that when it comes to a relationship partner, what you see is what you get. If you love your man, then love all of your man, or be clear on the fact that you’re signing up for more trouble than you can possibly want. Men aren’t homes women (or anyone else) can redecorate to suite their taste. They come as is.

If you try to change your man you will, in effect, become his mother. That’s a role you do not want to substitute for “wife.” And if you believe anything in this world, believe that if you turn into your man’s mother, he will turn into your son. Tell him he needs to eat more vegetables, and as sure as the day is long, he’ll start sneaking pizza.

Life’s too short. You want a man, not a boy. Successful relationships are built on respect, not the kind of co-dependant, mutually dyfunctional craziness that necessarily grows and develops whenever one person in a relationship is convinced that they always know what’s best for the other person in that relationship. Women shouldn’t act like that toward their men; men shouldn’t act like that toward their women.

If you think you’re in love with someone, you’re not. When you’re in love with someone, you know it. And one of the ways you know you’re in love with someone is that nothing that person does or says ever really bothers you at all.

(By the way: I’m not saying men can’t change; of course they can. I’m saying that you can’t make your man change — or predict when he’ll change, or how, or why. People only change from the inside out, never from the outside in.)

Remember: Love means never having to say they’re sorry.

(For related blogs o’ mine, see Six Tests To Determine If He’s Mr. Right, and Top 10 Tips For Becoming A Better Husband. and What’s In a Word: The Truth Behind Men’s Single Ads. But, really, Pick-Up Lines of Famous Men in History is just stupid. Funny, but stupid. So ignore that one.)

 

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to Ma.gnoliaAdd to TechnoratiAdd to FurlAdd to Newsvine

Top 10 Qualities to Look For in a Wife

In Family, Marriage, relationships on September 24, 2007 at 5:32 pm

My wife and I recently celebrated our 26th wedding anniversary. If you’re a single guy thinking about getting married, might I suggest, based on my experience, that you marry a woman who possesses the following 10 qualities?

1. So smart she constantly freaks you out with her humongous Absorb-O-Brain.

Upside: Hanging around with a smart person makes you smarter. Up to a point, of course. But still.
Downside: Smart people remember everything. Pretty mixed blessing.

 

2. So wise she makes Confucius look like Goober Pyle.

Upside: Your own private oracle!
Downside: Wise people are extremely good at anticipating the outcome of things that slightly less wise people do. Not always entirely gratifying.

 

3. So perfectly matches your idea of heart-stoppingly gorgeous that just looking at her wipes every thought out of your head.

Upside: Constant aesthetic revelation.
Downside: It’s rude to stare.

 

4. So compassionate she regularly makes you feel like Ivan the Terrible.

Upside: Constantly getting to see the highest aspect of human nature in action.
Downside: Basically stuck having to do the right thing all the time seriously cuts into TV-watching time. Not to mention savings account, what with all those charities, and all.

 

5. So funny you can barely stand it.

Upside: Never-ending yuks!
Downside: Getting all the jokes means really paying attention, always. Worth it—but still.

 

6. An indefatigable worker.

Upside: Stuff gets done.
Downside: Guilt for not helping with work can seriously interfere with naps.

 

7. The greatest artist you know you’ll ever meet.

Upside: (Relatively) free art!
Downside: A wife who’s driven by stuff you can’t even begin to understand.

 

8. Shares your spiritual values.

Upside: Duh.
Downside: None.

 

9. Sure that the highest human prize available in this life is a good marriage.

Upside: Willing to work to achieve a great relationship.
Downside: Willing to make you work to achieve a great relationship.

 

10. Absolutely without agenda or ambition for you beyond that you’re happy.

Upside: No nagging! Ever.
Downside: You have to decide what really makes you happy. Much trickier than it seems.

 

So remember, guys. To ensure a happy, long-lasting marriage, all you have to do is marry a woman who is smart, wise, beautiful, compassionate, funny, hard-working, aesthetically inspired, spiritual, passionately desirous of a good marriage, and has virtually no “ambitions” for you beyond that you’re happy.

That’s what I did, anyway.

Lucky, lucky me.

 

Related posts o’ mine: Six Tests to Determine If He’s Mr. Right, Top 10 Tips For Becoming a Better Husband, and Pick-Up Lines of Famous Men in History.

 

♣ Join me on Facebook here.

My Private, Difficult Conversation with Chrissie Hynde

In Autobiography, Humor, relationships on August 22, 2007 at 8:00 am

hynde0001.jpg 

Chrissie Hynde of The Pretenders. It’s so important she move on. 

As many of you already know, the other night I enjoyed (partially due, perhaps, to Martians afraid they were being watched) backstage access during a concert featuring REO Speedwagon, Stray Cats, The Pretenders, and ZZ Top.

Along with some friends my wife Cat and I were hanging around in a comfortable, furnished room backstage after The Pretenders’ set when Chrissie Hynde came in from her dressing room, wet-haired and freshened up after a typically dynamic performance. As soon as she stepped into the room the eight or nine of us already there spontaneously applauded for her.

The others did, anyway. I tried to quietly slip out the door. But it was too late. Chrissie had seen me.

I was near a bank of blossoming, fragrant honeysuckle vines when I felt Chrissie’s hand upon my arm. I turned and there she was, looking up at me through her frowzy bangs. Her trademark heavy mascara hardly hid the longing in her eyes.

“I was hoping you’d come,” she said in her slightly raspy, post-performance voice.

“Chrissie, please,” I said. “Don’t.”

“Did you like the set?” she said hopefully.

“Yes,” I said. “Of course I did. As always, you owned the stage.”

“I saw you, you know.”

Of course I knew. We’d been sitting in the very front row, smack in the middle, best seats in the house. I had tried to avoid taking those seats, for I knew what would happen if I sat so near the stage. It did.

Chrissie sang her entire set looking straight at me.

“Does she know you?!” my wife screamed at me while Chrissie was just above us, passionately singing about all the things of hers that she was going to use to get my attention.

I pretended that the deafening sound prevented my understanding what she’d said. But I knew she was asking the same question most everyone else in the packed amphitheatre was asking: Was Chrissie Hynde performing a private, personal concert for only one person, or what?

“I know you saw me,” I said. “And perhaps you saw my wife beside me?”

Chrissie made a dismissive, disparaging sound, and turned to pluck off a honeysuckle blossom. She smelled it for a moment, and then tossed it to the ground.

“You’re married,” she fairly spat. She tried, and failed, to hide the need beneath her anger. “How long have you been married?” she said. “It can’t be long at all. What is it? One year? Maybe two?”

“Twenty-six.”

“Huh?”

“Twenty-six. I’ve been married 26 years.”

“No you haven’t.”

“Yes I have.”

“No you haven’t.”

“Yes, Chrissie, I have. Cat and I had our 26th wedding anniversary just this week.  On August 16.”

“Really?” said Chrissie unbelievingly. She seemed to slowly drift off to somewhere inside her head. “Wow,” she murmured. Then she came out of it. “Oh, I don’t care,” she cried. She plucked and immediately discarded another blossom. “I don’t care how long it’s been. All I know is it’s been too long for me.” She took a hold of my forearm, hard. “It’s been too long,” she said in a near sob. She pulled my arm towards her. “Too long,” she whispered desperately. “John, can’t you see? I’m special. So special.”

“Chrissie,” I said. “Stop.”

I heard my wife’s voice say, “Let go of my husband’s arm, Chrissie Hynde.” I turned and saw Cat walking rapidly toward us. “And I mean, right now. Or so help me God, you’ll wish you were back on the chain gang.”

That Cat. She’s small, but … adequately scary in a pinch. She came and insinuated herself Chrissie and me. She turned to me.

“John,” she said. “John. John. John.”

I opened my eyes.

“What?” I said.

Oh. Right. I was off in a secluded area outside the backstage dressing rooms, lying on an amazingly comfortable, ultra-padded lounge chair. Cat was now sitting at my side.

“Were you dreaming about Chrissie Hynde?” she said.

“No,” I said, sitting up a bit. “How in the world do you know stuff like that?”

“Well, let’s see. Maybe because I heard you say ‘Chrissie, stop.’ I figured that might be a clue.”

“Well, it’s not,” I said. “I was dreaming about … something else.”

“Not only were you dreaming about Chrissie Hynde,” she said, “But you were dreaming you had to stop Chrissie Hynde from doing I don’t even want to know what.”

“Well,” I said, sensing the gig was up, “as it happens, she was being rather aggressive. Luckily, though, you arrived just in the nick of time.”

“Oh, right. I’m sure I did.”

“You did!” I told her about the last part of my dream. When I had finished, Cat said, ” ‘Or you’ll wish you were back on the chain gang.’? That’s what you had me say to Chrissie Hynde? You couldn’t think of anything cheesier for me to say.”

“That’s not cheesy. It’s great.” I leaned forward, and put my arms around her neck. “It did the job. You scared her.”

“I better have.” Cat waved her fist around a bit. “Gonna use my fist.”

Ha!

Man, Cat’s funny.

I leaned back in my chair, and took hold of Cat’s hand. We really had just celebrated our 26th. “Great show tonight, huh?” I said.

“The Pretenders, you mean? They were fantastic. Your girlfriend has got such a great voice.”

“The Pretenders, REO, Stray Cats, ZZ. Each of them was just so extraordinary.”

“They really were,” said Cat. She gazed lovingly at me, and gently squeezed my hand.

“It’s all about the long haul, isn’t it?” I said softly.

Pick-Up Lines Of Famous Men In History

In Family, Humor, relationships on August 9, 2007 at 9:57 am

isaac_newton0001.jpg

Issac Newton, sporting the tresses few women could resist 

 

In my last posting (here), I helped women understand the possible meaning of words men use to describe themselves in personal ads. Today, I’m hoping to assist single men by revealing the ice-breakers used by some of the most eminent men in history on the women they were hoping to date.

Adam: Let’s hide from Mr. Nosey up there, and have some fun. What’s the worst that could happen?

Noah: There’s room for one more!

Homer: Date me, or I’ll bore you to death.

Socrates: Date me, or I’ll confuse you to death.

Plato: Date me, or I’ll prove you don’t exist.

Alexander the Great: Do you know that I’m often called “The Great”? And I have no idea what the men call me, heh, heh, heh.

Julius Caesar: I came. I saw. I’m asking.

Michelangelo: I feel like before I met you, everyone I’d ever known was made of stone.

Leonardo da Vinci: I find your smile absolutely intriguing.

Martin Luther: Haven’t you heard? Turns out we wouldn’t have to go to confession at all!

Galileo: Other men may tell you they can bring you the moon. But look through this.

Sir Isaac Newton: Tell you what: You date me, and I’ll let you borrow my wig.

William Shakespeare: Forsooth! Gway’ne ferbernitch won myryacle portenieth! Fie uponst thou eyre’nt hisslyp! Wait! Come back!

George Washington: I cannot tell a lie. Martha is my sister. From Nevada.

Benjamin Franklin: You know, in France I’m considered quite the catch. I am, too! Stop laughing.

Napoleon: My dear, I could bring you the world on a platter. Seriously. By, like, this Thursday.

Abraham Lincoln: I know when you look at me, all you see is my gargantuan nose, ears, lips, chin, cheekbones, and eyebrows. And my Amish beard. And my stovepipe hat. And my mournful expression. And my ill-fitting clothes. You know what? Forget it.

Vincent Van Gogh: Ear’s lookin’ at you! 

Sigmund Freud: As far as I’m concerned, there’s just you and my mother–I mean, and no other.

Thomas Edison: I know you’ve never heard this phrase before, but trust me: You turn me on.

Albert Einstein: I know this sounds crazy, but I’m late for an important awards ceremony. Do you happen to have a comb or hairbrush on you that I could borrow?

Pablo Picasso: So, here come do often you?

Adolph Hitler: Hi, I’m Adolph Hit … come back!

Mahatma Gandhi: I’ve been watching you watching me. And I think we both know that, deep down, you want to rub my head.

Winston Churchill: I’ve been watching you watching me. And I think we both know that, deep down, you want to rub Mahatma Gandhi’s head. I can arrange that!

John Fitzgerald Kennedy: Next!

What’s in a Word: The Truth Behind Men’s Personal Ads

In Humor, relationships on August 7, 2007 at 4:13 am

indoorman0001.jpg

In his personal ad, this man wrote that he would like to “just get away, and see more of the world.”

These days many single people rely on personal ads as a way of having something else to laugh at once they’re done reading the comics. But it’s more than that, isn’t it? Once the initial yuks have passed, a lot of people keep right on reading the physical descriptions, likes, and dislikes of people they don’t know. And they do it for one simple reason: It feels like they’re reading someone else’s diary.

But of course, there are other reasons to read personal ads. For one, they reaffirm the truth that every American has the inalienable, God-given right to have others read stuff about them in the paper. More importantly, it’s hard to meet potential mates when you’re single. Where do you have time to meet anyone besides at work? And you can’t date people you work with, because if you do it’s only a matter of time before you have to break into your place of employment in the middle of the night and smash all the pictures that person keeps on their desk. And sure, your friends could introduce you to people they work with–but then you’d only have to break into their place of employment in the middle of the night. And then they’d have to pretend like they can’t pick you out of a police line-up. And then they always end up blaming their nervous breakdown on you. It’s just not worth it.

And that’s why we have personal ads.

The problem with personal ads, of course, is that they’re just that: Ads. They’re made to sell. And just as no used car dealer would ever run an ad saying anything like, “Runs okay. Only makes right turns,” no person is ever going to run a personal ad saying anything like, “I call my mother four times a day. I also often tickle my own nose hair with my tongue.” Forget it. Never happen.

But there’s hope! If you’re a single woman thinking of using personal ads as a way of meeting eligible bachelors, I can help you decipher the real meaning behind some of the euphemistic words men often use to describe themselves in such ads.

I shouldn’t do it; I shouldn’t betray my fellow men in this way.

Oh, what the heck. They’ll get over it.

Below are some words men often use in personal ads to describe themselves. I’m not saying these words always mean what I’m here suggesting they might. I’m simply saying that they might.

“Outgoing” for instance, just might mean “recently evicted.”

“Self-assured”? Could mean “narcissistic.”

“Loves conversation?” “You couldn’t shut me up with a muzzle and a stun gun.”

In general, when you read the first word below, think of what comes after it.

“Active.”  Manic.

“Sensitive.”  Severe allergies.

“Easy going.”  Passive-aggressive.

“Caring.”  Smothering.

“Devoted.”  Stalker.

“Understanding.”  Condescending.

“Athletic.”  Lives in sweats.

“Relaxed.”  Slob.

“Cuddly.”  Will sit on you.

“Quiet.”  Dangerous.

“Resourceful.”  Broke.

“Family-oriented.”  Lives with mother

“Loves films.”  Loves popcorn.

“Crazy.”  Crazy.

“Book lover.”  Insomniac.

“Independent.”  Incapable of commitment.

“Career-oriented.”  Boring.

“Loves conversation.”  Had TV repossessed.

“Great sense of humor!”  Not unless ad’s funny.

“Likes to travel.”  Wanted by law.

“Super-confident.”  Super on steroids.

“Loves good wine.”  Wino.

“Intellectual.”  Wino.

“Art lover.”  Pretentious wino.

“Effervescent.” May have to kill.

“Whimsical.” Unpredictable.

“Unpredictable.” Psychotic.

“Low maintenance.” Can’t get off couch.

“Enjoys outdoors.”  Homeless.

“Divorced.”  Obsessed.

“Many interests.”  Has cable.

“Stable.”  Medicated.

“Love dogs.”  Has fleas.

“Love cats.”  Has intimacy issues.

 

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to Ma.gnoliaAdd to TechnoratiAdd to FurlAdd to Newsvine