John Shore

Archive for January 2008

My Giant Head

In Autobiography, Family, Humor on January 31, 2008 at 4:36 pm

Seems to me this would be a good time to take a break from the Major Commentary Action happening with my last post, What Non-Christians Want Christians To Hear.  Before too very long I am sure we will revisit the topic of Christian and Non-Christian Relations — but for now, lemme offer this bit o’ something completely different, which for some reason popped into my head this afternoon:

One of my earliest memories is of lying on my back in my crib, think­ing, “My head is too huge to move without breaking something vital. What a bummer.” It was awful. My head and neck felt like a piece of garden hose jammed into a medicine ball. And I really wanted to move my head, too. I knew there were places to go out there, things to do, people to see. I could hear life happening just outside the confines of my room. My mom cooking and clean­ing. My dad grousing about having to make a living. My sister mur­muring threaten­ingly about how nice life around there used to be. I yearned to par­tici­pate in it all. But I couldn’t. My stupid head was so huge I couldn’t even get it off the mattress.

As it turned out, I really did have a big head. So big that years later, when I was play­ing Little Leauge baseball, I had to buy my baseball cap from the manager’s catalogue, instead of from the normal kid catalogue all my teamates used. It was pretty embarrassing.

COACH CRETIN: Okay, Shore, whaddaya? An extra-large?

ME: I think so, coach. Probably.

COACH CRETIN: Well, let’s make sure. Parker’s got an extra-large there, doncha’ Parker? Shore, try on Parker’s cap. (Parker hands me his cap. I put it on.) Jeezus. Looki’ that. You can barely get it to balance on yer head. What are we gonna do for a cap for you, Shore? Pin it on? Ya’ can’t wear wear that in the field. It’ll cut off the circulation in yer head. Yer ears’ll fall off. (Much laugh­ter.) Whatta we gonna do, Shore? What are we gonna’ do for a hat for you?”

ME: Um . . . I dunno, Coach.

COACH CRETIN: Well, crap. I guess we’ll just have to order ya’ a cap from the managers’ catolog, then. It’s gonna cost ya’ extra, though. You tell that to your mom, Shore. Tell your mom your new cap’s gonna cost you more, on accounta ya’ got a head like a blimp. Don’t forget to tell her that, Shore. Tell her it’s gonna’ cost more money.

ME: Sure thing, coach. Say, why you’re at it, why don’t you order my athletic supporter and cup through the managers’ catalog, too? My head’s not the only thing that’s adult-size, you Nazi dink.

Okay, I didn’t say that last part.

Coaches. Can’t live with them, can’t figure out how to kill ‘em in their sleep.

Amazingly enough, there was a kid in my neighbor­hood with a head even larger than mine. Tommy Wrightsman. What a noggin that poor kid had. It was like some­thing you’d see float­ing down the street in the Macy’s Thanksgiv­ing Day Parade, threatening helicopters, terrifying children. I think the main reason Tommy’s head looked so much larger than mine was because he had such a small face — it was like his face had just given bloom to this monster growth around it. Plus, his head was inor­dinately, spectacularly, basketballishly round. Plus his mom cut his light-colored hair in a buzz cut all around his head, so it looked like his brain was emitting static electricity. Poor Tommy Wrightsman. He was a good guy to hang out with. Especially when you needed some shade.

Anyway, that’s one of my first memories: lying face up in my crib, staring at the ceiling, being oppressed by my giant baby head. The next thing I re­mem­ber after that is my mom’s gargantuan head suddenly looming over the walls of my crib at me. Her head was so . . . so mobile. And that hair! It was clear to me even then that if her hair had been any bigger or stiffer, it could have dropped right off her head and killed me. And I remember being extremely clear about who she was, too: I knew this was the one from whom I’d come. I re­member think­ing as I looked up at her, “I know that smell. I know this person. I came from her. She has great skin. Wonderful eyes. Giant hair. Excellent head movement.”

My next thought — and I’m weirdly embarrassed to even write this, but …. whaddaya’ gonna do? — was that if this woman wanted to, she could easily take my life. With her big hands. With her big head. With her big hair. On accident. On purpose. On a whim.

And in that moment I became entirely sure of one thing: Doing everything I could to ensure my own survival meant becoming as cute and as cuddly as it was possible for me to become.

“Goo-goo,” I said.

My mother smiled down lov­ingly upon me.

“Goo-goo!” I said.

For a related piece, see Baby Hitchhiker.

What Non-Christians Want Christians To Hear

In Atheists, Christianity, Religion on January 30, 2008 at 10:39 am

Last year I posted a notice on Craigslists all over the country saying … well, exactly this: “I’m about three months away from finishing a book I’m writing for a large, established, reputable Christian book publisher. [I had to say this true thing so that people would take it seriously.] It’ll be my third published book. This one is about the relationship that generally exists between Christians and non-Christians. In it I want to incorporate maybe thirty 100-250 word statements wherein non-Christians–in their own words, in casual, straight-ahead, first-person style–say what they think of Christians generally–and specifically how they feel about the dynamic wherein Christians try to convert them. I want to be very clear that this is NOT a Christian-bashing book; I wouldn’t have sold it to such a prominent Christian publishing house if it were. It’s coming from a place that only means well for everyone. Thanks.”

Within about four days I had in my inbox over 300 statements from non-Christians. I found they made for some seriously depressing reading. Here are some of them:

“The main thing that baffles and angers me about Christians is how they can understand so little about human nature that when, in their fervor to convert another person, they tell that person (as they inevitably do, in one way or another), ‘You’re bad, and wrong, and evil,’ they actually expect that person to agree with them. It pretty much guarantees that virtually the only people Christians can ever realistically hope to convert are those with tragically low self-esteem.”— E.S., Denver

“I feel that Christians have got it all wrong; it seems to me that they’ve created the very thing Jesus was against: Separatism.”— T. O., Denver

“I am often distressed at the way some Christians take as a given that Christians and Christianity define goodness. Many of we non-Christians make a practice of doing good; we, too, have a well-developed ethical system, and are devoted to making the world a better place. Christians hardly have a monopoly on what’s right, or good, or just.”— C.R., Seattle

“Christians seem to have lost their focus on Jesus’ core message: ‘Love the Lord your god with all your heart and with all your soul, and love your neighbor as you love yourself.’”— R.M., Tacoma, WA

“I have no problem whatsoever with God or Jesus—only Christians. It’s been my experience that most Christians are belligerent, disdainful and pushy.” — D.B., Atlanta

“Whenever I’m approached by an evangelist—by a Christian missionary—I know I’m up against someone so obsessed and narrowly focused that it will do me absolutely no good to try and explain or share my own value system. I never want to be rude to them, of course, but never have any idea how to respond to their attempts to convert me; in short order, I inevitably find myself simply feeling embarrassed—first for them, and then for us both. I’m always grateful when such encounters conclude.”— K.C., Fresno, CA.

“I don’t know whether or not most of the Christians I come across think they’re acting and being like Jesus was—but if they do, they need to go back to their Bibles, and take a closer look at Jesus.” — L.B., Phoenix

“I grew up Jewish in a Southern Baptist town, where I was constantly being told that I killed Christ, ate Christian babies, and was going to hell. So I learned early that many Christians have—or sure seem to have—no love in their hearts at all. It also seems so odd to me that Christians think that if I don’t accept their message my ears and heart are closed, because it seems to me like they have excessively closed ears and hearts to anyone else’s spiritual message and experience. They seem to have no sense of the many ways in which God reaches out to everyone. As far as I’ve ever known, Christians are narrow in their sense of God, fairly fascistic in their thinking, and extremely egotistical in thinking God only approves of them.”— B.P., Houston

“I wish Christians would resist their aggressive impulses to morph others into Christians. Didn’t Jesus preach that we should all love one another?”— M.G., Shoreline, WA

“I’m frequently approached by Christians of many denominations who ask whether I’ve accepted Christ as my savior. When I have the patience, I politely tell them that I’m Jewish. This only makes them more aggressive; they then treat me like some poor lost waif in need of their particular brand of salvation. They almost act like salespeople working on commission: If they can save my soul, then they’re one rung closer to heaven. It’s demeaning. I always remain polite, but encounters like these only show disrespect and sometimes outright intolerance for my beliefs and my culture. In Judaism, we do not seek to convert people. That is because we accept that there are many paths to God, and believe that no one religion can lay sole claim to the truth or to God’s favor. Each person is free to find his or her own way. To Christians I would say: Practice your religion as you wish. There is no need to try and influence others. If your religion is a true one, people will come to it on their own.”— M.S., Honolulu

“When did it become that being a Christian meant being an intolerant, hateful bigot? I grew up learning the positive message of Christ: Do well and treat others with respect, and your reward will be in heaven. Somehow, for a seemingly large group of Christians, that notion has gone lost: It has turned into the thunders and lights of the wrath of God, and into condemning everyone who disagrees with them to burning in the flames of hell. Somehow, present-day Christians forgot about turning the other cheek, abandoned the notion of treating others like they would like to be treated themselves; they’ve become bent on preaching, judging, and selfishly attempting to save the souls of others by condemning them. What happen to love? To tolerance? To respect?”—S.P., Nashville

“There are about a million things I’d like to say to Christians, but here’s the first few that come to mind: Please respect my right to be the person I’ve chosen to become. Worship, pray and praise your God all you want—but please leave me, and my laws, and my city, and my school alone. Stop trying to make me, or my children, worship your god. Why do we all have to be Christians? Respect my beliefs; I guarantee they’re every bit as strong as yours. Mostly, please respect my free will. Let me choose if I want to marry someone of my own sex. Let me choose if I want to have an abortion or not. Let me choose to go to hell if that’s where you believe I’m going. I can honestly say that I’d rather go to hell than live the hypocritical life I see so many Christians living.”— D.B., Seattle

“I had a friend who was, as they say, reborn. During my breaks from college she invited me to her church, and I did go a couple of times. In a matter of a month, at least ten people at her church told me that I was going to hell. The ironic thing is that I do believe in God; I’ve just never found a church where I felt at ease. However, in their eyes, I was nothing but a sinner who needed to be saved. I stopped going to that church (which in the past four years has grown from a small to a mega-church), but in time, through my friend, have seen some of these people again. None of them ever fails to treat me exactly as they did four years ago. All I can say is this: Constantly telling someone they’re going to hell is not a good way to convert them.”— A.S., Chicago

“I am a former ‘born again’ Christian. It’s been my personal experience that Christians treat the poor poorly—much like the Pharisees did in the parable of the old woman with the two coins. I found the church to be political to a fault, and its individual members all too happy to judge and look down on others. As a Christian, my own fervor to witness was beyond healthy. My friends would come to me to vent and express emotions, and all I would do is preach to them. I was of no real comfort to them. I never tried to see anything from their perspective.”— J.S.W, Philadelphia

“Once Christians know I’m gay, the conversion talk usually stops. Instead, I become this sympathetic character who apparently isn’t worthy of the gift of Christ. From my childhood in a Baptist church, I recall the ‘loathe the sin, love the sinner’ talk, but as an adult I can’t say I’ve often found Christians practicing that attitude. Deep down, I’m always relieved to avoid disturbing “conversion” conversations with Christians; discussing one’s most intimate thoughts and personal beliefs isn’t something I enjoy doing with random strangers. But at the same time, I feel as though Christians make a value judgment about my soul on the spot, simply because I am gay. I don’t pretend to know the worth of a soul, nor the coming gifts to those who convert the masses, but I would guess converting the sinful homosexuals would merit a few brownie points. But I get the feeling that most Christians don’t think we’re worth the hassle.”— R.M., Houston

“Religion always seemed too personal for me to take advice about it from people I don’t know.”— D.P., Denver

The above comments originally appeared in my book I’m OK–You’re Not: The Message We’re Sending Nonbelievers and Why We Should Stop, published in early 2007 by NavPress. (About five such comments appeared at the end of each of the book’s chapter, under the heading of “Ouch.”)

Top 10 Ways Christians (Including Me) Tend to Fail

In Gays and Lesbians, Religion on January 28, 2008 at 12:08 pm

Happy Monday!

All right, enough folderol. Back to work. Here’s my vote for Top 10 Ways Christians (Including Me) Tend to Fail:

1. Too much money.  It seems to me that a rich Christian is an oxymoron. Jesus was fairly abstruse about a fair number of things, but he was crystaline about Christians needing to give their all to the poor. In Luke 12:33, Jesus says, ”Sell your possessions and give to the poor.” At Matthew 19:21, he says, “If you want to be perfect, go, sell your possessions and give to the poor.” In Matthew 6:24, he says: “You cannot serve God and Money.” I just don’t see a lot of wiggle room there. And yet, somehow, we all keep finding just enough to allow us to keep all the stuff we love so much.

2. Too confident that God thinks we’re all that and a leather-bound gift Bible.  I’d like to humbly suggest that we spend a little more more time wondering how we displease God, and a little less time being confident that we do.

3. Too quick to believe that we know what God really means by what he says in the Bible.  The Bible is one extremely complex, multi-leveled work. We’re sometimes too quick, I think, to assume that we grasp it. Take this passage, for instance, from Luke 8: 9-10: “His disciples asked him [Jesus] what this parable [of the sower] meant. He said, “The knowledge of the secrets of the kingdom of God has been given to you, but to others I speak in parables, so that, ‘though seeing, they may not see; though hearing, they may not understand.’” Now, I don’t care who you are, or how many  theology degrees you have, that is one thick thought. And that’s Jesus “explaining” one of the most accessible of his parables! Are we really all that confident that we always know exactly what Jesus meant by everything he said? Wouldn’t just the slightest bit of doubt sometimes be in order?

4. Too action-oriented.  I think we Christians could stand to spend less time acting in the name of God, and more time reflecting on the (ever subtle) majesty of God. More passivity, less activity, I say. More meditation, less machination. More reflection, less correction. More contemplation, less administration. More mysticism, less cretinism. More prayer, less Bayer. More … okay, that’s enough. Sorry. I have rhyming issues.

 5. Too invasive of others generally. It is my personal, humble, no-need-to-send-me-hate-mail opinion that we Christians are sometimes too eager to mix Church with State. They don’t (and again: just my opinion!) belong together. One is good for we Christians; one is good for everyone. As much as I personally would like it to be, America is not a Protestant country. It’s a Catholic country, and a Jewish country, and an atheist country, and a Buddhist country, and a Mormon country, and (yes) a Muslim country. It’s a country for everyone. Religion is a personal, subjective affair for the individual; politics and public policy is an impersonal, objective affair for everyone. Better to keep them separate. Fair is fair.

6. Too invasive of others personally.  We Christians are sometimes too eager to get up into the faces of others about their personal religious beliefs. I know most of us believe that the moment someone who isn’t a Christian dies, that person is immediately herded onto the worst Down Elevator ever, and that we must therefore vigilantly strive to turn everyone who in this life isn’t a Christian into one. Noble sentiment! But what we seem to too often lose sight of is how impossible it is to talk someone who isn’t a Christian into being one. I think maybe we should spend more time “just” living as Christians, and letting God worry about the non-Christians. I’m pretty sure he can handle that job. He saved me, and that phenomenon sure didn’t have anything to do with anyone ever telling me I should become a Christian. Trust me on this: I was saved in spite of Christians trying to save me, not because of them.

7. Too quick to abandon logic.  I think when talking to others about our faith, we Christians too often resort to a language and line of reasoning that leaves good ol’ fashion logic sitting on the ground behind us, waving a sad good-bye. “It’s true because the Bible says it’s true” can’t mean anything to a non-Christian, because (hurt though it does to admit it, I know) it’s such a manifestly illogical assertion. ”It’s true because the Bible says it’s true” is no more a reason for anything actually (as in objectively) being true than was your parents’ old, infinitely frustrating ”Because I said so!” As a logical argument, “It’s true because someone with a vested interest in it being true says it’s true” is Beyond Useless. Why in our dealings with non-Christians we so often fail to grasp that is a total mystery to me.

8. Too fixated on gays and lesbians.  Can we followers of Christ maybe just stop already with the fixating on homosexuality? I know it’s a “hot button” issue. I know we understand our stance on the matter to be unassailably Biblical. I know we’re deeply concerned about the “homosexual agenda.” I know. We all know. Maybe we could just give it a rest for awhile, though? Even for just a week?  Wouldn’t that be nice? It’s not like gay and lesbian people are going anywhere. They’ll all be there when we get back. Maybe we could just give them, and us, a rest for a minute.

9. Too insular.  When I became a Christian, one of the things that most amazed me about Christians is the degree to which they tend to hang out only with other Christians. We should stop doing that. How are we supposed to share Christ’s love with non-Christians when we barely knowany non-Christians? Time to widen that social base, I say. (Plus, Christian or not, we still want to throw good, fun parties, don’t we? Well, let’s face it: The pagans have all the good music. We might as well invite a few of them to our next party. Maybe they’ll bring their CD’s!)

10. Too quick to condemn fellow Christians. It’s been my humble, limited experience that too many Christians spend entirely too much time thinking and talking about how wrong the beliefs and practices are of other kinds of Christians. Maybe we should spend a little more time thinking about how all we Christians are the same, rather than how we’re different. Maybe fundamentalist and “liberal” Christians have a lot more in common than we tend to remember, or reflect upon, or celebrate. Maybe if we concentrated a little more on our similarities, non-Christians observing us would have less reason to doubt that, at its core, Christianity is, in fact, all about love.

My Big Week in Christian Book Publishing

In Religion, Writing on January 26, 2008 at 7:39 am

The book business is reeeeeeeeeeeeeally slow; it is like unto the rest of our media as the Pony Express is to email. Insane. Anyway, it means that whenever anything actually does happen with any book you write, it registers (to you, anyway) as a fairly big deal. This week four things happened with books of mine, which I figured I’d now bore you with.

First, on Tuesday I found at my door a box delivered by UPS that turned out to contain the first copy I’d seen of Midlife Manual for Men, a book I wrote with Steve Arterburn that’ll be in stores in a week or two. It’s got an exceptionally well designed, slick, super-shiny cover, with the raised/embossed lettering and all. Very snazzy. (You can see the front of that cover on its Amazon page, which is here.) And there’re bunch of endorsements on the book’s back cover and front page that are so glowing they’re actually embarrassing to read. Also in the box was the four-disc CD audio-version of MM4M, which is the whole book read aloud by Steve.  Midlife is Bethany Publishing’s lead book for at least Spring ‘08, so they’ve printed tons of copies of it, and it’ll be available everywhere. I have no idea if anyone’ll want to interview me about the book, or whatever. Steve’s the star, of course. He’ll be doing all kinds of media about it.

Anyway. It was fun to see that stuff.

Also, The Discerning Reader, a website whereon a handful of conservative Christians review books in order to ”help Christians avoid being unduly influenced by books and teachers that are not honoring to God” (according to their “About” page), has just published a review of my book, “Penguins, Pain and the Whole Shebang,” by God (as told to John Shore). (Amazon-wise, that book is here.) That DR review is here. One of the more formidable things about the review is that it features, right off the bat, the word “anthropopathism.”

Quick: Say ”anthropopathism” three times. Or once, even.

At the top of their reviews, The Discerning Reader runs quick summations of the review/book at hand. The one for Penguins says: “In short: A witty and unpredictable book for unbelievers. Christian readers beware.”

So you’ve been warned. Beware!

Also, this week the Christian megasite Crosswalk.com published an excerpt from the introduction of Midlife, which you can read here.

Finally, I found out this week I’ll soon be getting a decent little royalty check from the German edition of Penguins, which apparently is doing pretty well. That’s nice to find out.

And there you have it. Not much, as I say. Unless you’re me. Then it’s kind of not entirely unexciting.

Hello, Students at the Kazakhstan Institute of Management, Economics and Strategic Research!

In Travel, World, technology on January 24, 2008 at 2:30 pm

Hello, students at the Kazakhstan Institute of Management, Economics and Strategic Research! Your teacher (whose name I do not know, but on my blog she uses the intriguing screen name of “Kazakhnomad”) asked me to write to you.

My name is John Shore. I make a living writing books. Writing is a great way to make a living, because it means you get to sit on your rear end all day. I live in the city of San Diego. If you are driving south in the American state of California, San Diego is the last city you hit before driving into Mexico. The immigration point between San Diego and Mexico is the world’s busiest land border crossing. That means lots of Mexicans live in San Diego, which is wonderful. It is wrong to stereotype people, but I think Mexicans must be the kindest people in the world.

I am writing to you because your teacher said that some of you are hesitant about writing about yourself and/or your life. I would like to encourage you to overcome that hesitancy, and do it. It would be impossible for me to communicate to you how happy and eager Americans would be to learn whatever they could about you and your life. I don’t know if you’re aware of this or not (though I’m guessing you just might be), but as a general rule Americans are not very knowledgeable about people and cultures in other parts of the world. It is not because we are not interested in people and cultures in other parts of the world. We totally are. It’s just that we tend to be extremely busy, mostly because we work a lot. (Say what you will about Americans, but we work like crazy.) Plus, we go to the movies quite a bit. We also play a lot of video games. And eat — Americans are huge on eating (which is why we ourselves tend to be huge — but that’s another story.) So all that takes a lot of time.

Please write about your lives, so that we can learn about you and whatever you want to write about. I personally am intensely interested in virtually anything you would have to say, because (as far as I know), I’ve never known anyone who even knew anyone who knew anyone from Kazakhstan. I am now officially fascinated by Kazakhstan. I want to know what you ate for dinner last night, and how typical a meal it was. (See? We’re always thinking about food!) I want to know what kind of house you live in. I want to know what your father and/or mother does for a living. I want to know what you do or want to do for a living. I’m veryeager to learn what it is you’re learning about at the Kazakhstan Insitute of Management, Economics and Strategic Research. Do you have to pay money to study at the KIMESR? Is it free? Does the government pay for you to go there? Did you have to qualifyin any way to attend the KIMESR? How far away from the school do you live? How do you get to the school? Car? Bike? Bus? Walk?

Please start a blog, so that we can all learn about you and your life in Kazakhstan. (I personally like blogging with www.wordpress.com. It’s great — and free!) I’m begging you to start the blog I know your teacher would like to see you write on. I promise you that we here in America are dying to know what life is like in a place as mysterious and foreign to us as Kazakhstan. You probably think your life is boring. But that’s normal; everyone thinks their life is boring. But it is a odd fact of human nature that even though everyone thinks their own life is pretty dull, everyone is still intensely interested in the lives of other people. And you better believe that here in America lots and lots of people will be interested in you, since you are from the exotic, distant land Kazakhstan. As far as we’re concerned, there is simply no way for you not to be interesting.

And please, please, please do not be shy about the quality of your written English. You should know, in fact, that most everyone here in America has trouble writing correctly, and I’m not kidding. English is infinitely confusing. We know that. And we all know we know that, too. So when we write, we just try to do our best, and hope that whomever reads what we wrote will at least understand the general idea of whatever we were trying to say.

Besides, it’s not like we know how to write in your language. As I say, most of us can barely handle English. If you even try to write in English, we will be so deeply impressed by you that … well, that we just might try our hand at writing something in your language.

What is your language, by the way? What do you speak, and read, and think, and dream in?

You see? We (or at least I) am totally ignorant about Kazakhstan. This is an abysmal, embarassing fact that you can help correct. Do! Please help me, and other interested people in the world, learn what we can about you. Share with us your thoughts, your ideas, your convictions, your beliefs, understandings, perspectives, processes, habits, aspirations. Tell us what you do for fun on the weekends. Tell us about what religion you practice — or why you practice no religion. Tell us about the last date you went on. Tell us if you have a pet. Tell us anything.

Just start writing. Do not worry about your English grammar, or any of that nonsense. Just do your best. We’ll fill in the blanks or awkward spots. We’ll know what you mean. And if not, we’ll ask you what you meant.

They say it’s a small world. I, for one, would be grateful if you’d help make it smaller.

Writing Is Talking Like Mime Is Opera

In HowTo, Writing on January 22, 2008 at 7:12 pm

A couple of readers were kind enough to ask me to elaborate on a point I made in My Last, Best 10 Tips On How To Make It As A Writer, about how talking and writing are “exact opposite uses of the language.” So here’s my case for why writing is no more like talking than mime is like opera:

Spoken language is very much about maintaining societal mores; it’s basically about not offending people. Speaking to others is (duh) how we get along with them, so it’s deeply grounded in ancient, at-this-point-instinctive ambiguity.  The core, formative idea when you’re talking to people — especially in any kind of group setting — is to keep things friendly, to accommodate the thoughts and feelings of the others in your group, to be … well, social.  Talking is about cooperative give-and-take, sharing, keeping things open-ended in such a way that no one involved in the conversation feels too threatened or challenged.

Talking is about mostly about equivocation, inconclusiveness, changeableness; it’s about an ongoing, manifest, subtly communicated sense of demurral. Talking is grounded in serving and supporting the idea that everyone’s point of view and experience is as valid as everyone else’s. That’s what being social means — and talking, of course, is our primary socializing tool.

Talking is about keeping things subjective. It’s about relativism.

Well, writing is exactly the opposite of that. Writing is about keeping things objective. It’s about absolutism. It’s about keeping everything absolutely un ambiguous. It’s about explicitness, certitude, precision, clarity, transparency. Writing is about very purposeful precision, utter decipherability.

The kind of maniacal, measured exactitude that defines good writing doesn’t go with socializing. It goes with no one ever inviting you anywhere because you always come off like such a conversational Nazi.

Anyway, that’s why thinking that being a good talker makes you a good writer is like thinking that being a good swimmer makes you a good cruise ship pilot. They’re completely different — and even opposing — uses of the same Basic Medium.

So that’s the core of my own personal pet theory about why people tend to be so wrong when, knowing themselves to be tactful and engaging conversationalists, they assume they’ll also be good writers.

This is slightly off-track, but connected enough to say: The trick to good writing — the challenge, the monumental difficulty, the freakin’ nightmare of it — lies in the brain-splitting alchemy that is changing something that’s subjective into something objective.

My Last, Best 10 Tips on How To Make It As A Writer

In HowTo, Writing on January 21, 2008 at 2:05 pm

Hi, guys. This little series on writing I’ve been doing here has been a blast for me, and I appreciate your indulgence on it. (Uh, let’s see; so far we have: How To Make a Living WritingHow To Make a Living Writing, Part TwoWriting: Don’t Get Me Started; How To Write, Part Three, and the not-entirely-popular How To Write, Part Four: Why You Should Give Up Trying to Find Your Own Voice.) Before I stop boring everyone with this stuff, though, I thought I’d offer these final Top 10 Tips For Actually Making It As A Writer, since … well, since I sure could have used this stuff, once. Anyway, here are those tips, in no particular order:

Take it seriously.  It’s just about impossible to make a living writing, so doing so means Fanatical Focus. When I decided to start making a living a writing, I wrote (for free, for all kinds of local publications) every night after work for four to six hours, and throughout every weekend. Six months into that I was offered my first job as an editor; three months after that, I was making a great living as the main entertainment features writer for (then) new website of the San Diego Union-Tribune. Lesson being: Sweat pays. 

Decide right off what kind of writing you want to do. Journalism? Fiction? Nonfiction? Magazine articles? Plays? Poetry/song lyrics? Each of these fields has its own rules, outlets, primary players, processes — and each is filled with talented people who are totally dedicated to only that form of writing. Decide what you want to write, and immerse yourself in that kind of writing. You can really only swim in one pool at a time.

Learn to think before you write. So many writers think that beautiful thoughts come from beautiful words. Wrong. First have the clear, beautiful thought, and then let the only words that can express that thought naturally attach themselves to it. That’s how you get a style. Put developing a style first, and at best you’ll end up as a writer with a nice enough technique, but nothing to say. The world has plenty of those. Never forget that the only point of writing is to serve thought.

Cultivate relationships. People in publishing are just like everyone else in the world, and everyone prefers to do business with people they know, or at least people who know people they know. Buy a Rolodex. Get busy emailing, phoning, writing, networking. Be proud; never act like you need anyone more than they need you. But make it so that when as many people as possible do need someone, they think of you.

Believe in your lack of competition. It’s true there are a zillion writers out there, but 99.99% of them have no idea what they’re doing. A decent writer (let alone a great one) is as rare as rare gets. You know all that great writing you see in magazines? That was all done by editors who shaped whatever they got from their freelancers into whatever you read. Writing is freakishly difficult (because it’s so hard to make what’s subjective objective). Very few people are good at it. Become one of those few, and within a very short time you’ll have more work than you can handle.

Start where you are.You’ve got to work your way up. You’d think that you could write stuff so great that an editor will see it and basically pluck you from obscurity and publish it — but boy, would you be wrong. Everyone along the food chain of publishing is already swamped with people and material appropriate to their level of publishing. You can’t just step into an arena you don’t naturally belong in. Start where it’s not at unreasonable to expect you could get a foothold. Get that foothold — and then take the next step. Try to go around, or try to take a short cut, and you go nowhere.

Don’t sweat rejection. There are an infinite number of perfectly good reasons why anything you write might get rejected that have nothing whatsoever to do with the quality of the rejected work. If someone bounces your work back to you, forget it, and move on. It means nothing. Keep submitting. There’s always another outlet you can approach. And it only takes one to publish you.

Get an agent. Trying to publish a book with one of the larger, mainstream book publishers without an agent is like trying to fly without wings. It can’t happen. Publishers depend upon agents to bring them stuff to publish. If you take your writing career seriously, know that you do need an agent. And as is true in every field, agents are aligned along a power hierarchy. About 5% of them sell 90% of the books. You want an agent in that 5% club. And that means you’ve got to have a body of work behind you that makes at least one of them want to participate in your future. (And forget whatever nonsense you’ve ever heard about agents not being worth their 15% of your money. A good agent is worth twice that.)

Believe you’re a genius. Hey, someone’s gotta be. Why not you? And it’s surely not your goal to be a mediocre writer, is it? Believe you’ve got a unique, valuable, indispensable, irreplaceable voice. Because you do. (That said, though, let me cram this in here: Do not think that just because you can talk you can write. They’re not the same thing at all. They’re exact opposite uses of language, actually. Which is actually a whole other piece I’ll be happy to write if anyone wants me to.)

Write a lot. A lot. For years and years and years and years. And not for yourself, either: For others. For publication. Subject your work to the brutality of the marketplace. Learn to hone it, trim it, shape it, toss it, bend it, maul it, polish it, lose it. Write for so long, and so consistently, for so many different kinds of outlets and editors, that eventually you come to know, without reference to what anyone else thinks, what’s good. That knowledge is your ticket. Costs a lot. Worth a fortune.

Okay! Thanks! I don’t know if I’ll write any more of these How To Write-type posts, since … enough is enough already, I would imagine. Then again, since this stuff is basically my entire life, I could … go on until every last one of you insists I stop. Anyway, thanks for reading them. I appreciate it.

How to Write, Part Three

In HowTo, Humor, Writing on January 16, 2008 at 1:48 pm

First of all, I want to again thank everyone who wrote to express their sympathy for … well, what I wrote in My Stepmother Passed Away. I’m going to wait a day or two to see if any more such comments come in; I’ll then gather them into a single document and mail them to my father. He’ll cry to read them, I know. So again let me thank you all for the role you’ve played and will play yet in my family’s processing of this sadness.

So then: Back to the writing stuff. (If you’re … new here, or whatever, first I wrote How To Make a Living Writing; then How To Make a Living Writing, Part Two; then Writing: Don’t Get Me Started; then my poor stepmother became late; and now … here we be, G.)

I’m starting to feel a little pretentious offering writing advice; already I can barely stop myself from growing a goatee, smoking a pipe, and assuming a forlorn, haunted expression. Writing’s an art; producing art is as personal as personal gets; trying to guide anyone’s who’s producing art via General Principles or (where’s my pipe!) Sagacious Insights, is like trying to show someone a rose over the phone.

Oh, wait. You can do that now.

Wow! It’s moments just like this that make you realize how soon it’s going to be before you start rethinking just how funny all the bizzaro geriatric equipment at the drugstore really is.

Okay, this could be another such “Are We Old Yet?” moment: Today, at the gym I joined about three weeks ago, I blithley walked into the ladies’ locker room.  Absolutely unbelievable. I was like Bigfoot having a heart attack in a harem.

I can’t think about it. It’s too painful. Let’s move on.

Right. Writing.

So here’s some advice I actually have given newerish-type writers. You pretend you’re a newbie writer to whom I’m giving advice, and I’ll pretend I’m a wizened, insightful writer who’s never strolled soaking wet into women’s locker room while wearing a Speedo:

“Young (or relatively inexperienced) writer! Listen to me! For verily do I have for you some top-drawer Writing Advice that’s actually real and true. Ready? Here it is: It’s not about you.

“You want to be a writer, right? Well, what people usually mean when they say that is that they’re very keen on communicating to the world what it’s like to be, specifically, them: to have their unique vision, their ideas, their sensibilities, their relationships, their experiences, their … whole thing. Right? And that makes perfect sense: What is art, if not an expression of individuality?

“Without question, a monumental part of being an artist is identifying, corralling, and ultimately allowing to dominate the process by which you express it the very essence of who you are. An artist must find his own voice, period. (And we can certainly talk about that process if … if anyone’s still reading this series.)

“But another massive, indispensable part of being an artist — of being a writer — is understanding that everything in the world has its own truth, a truth that doesn’t have anything whatsoever  to do with you. People who want to write are often so wrapped up in what they think about a thing that they never let that thing tell them what to think about it. Things — people, relationships, experiences, virtually everything — have their own integrity, their own dynamic, their own process, context, purpose, rhythm, reason. If you really want to be a writer, you have to learn to wipe out all your ideas and preconceptions about as much stuff as you possibly can, and let whatever it is that has your attention tell and show you what it is.”

Okay, that’s enough now with the quotes / fake speech-making.

Here’s the bottom line: Someone who is more interested in themselves than they are the world at large probably won’t make it as a writer. You have to be insanely empathetic to be a writer. To be a writer you have to think everything is more interesting than you.

Writing isn’t about exercising your ego. It’s about erasing your ego. It’s about getting out of the way of whatever needs to be said, so that it can be said in a way that does justice to the thing that’s telling you what you need to say about it.

Would-be writers are forever wanting to share themselves with the world. Fair enough; that’s a big part of writing, for sure. But if, in being totally honest with yourself, you find that you are more interested in sharing yourself with the world than you are with, in essence, sharing the world with the world, then save yourself the trouble, and stop imagining you’re a writer. You’re not.

Lucky you. You’re normal.

My Stepmother Passed Away

In Autobiography, Family on January 14, 2008 at 5:04 pm

This morning my father called from across the country to tell me that his wife of 40 years — my stepmother since I was 10 — had passed away.

The chemotherapy for her cancer proved too much.

This woman was the first person who ever showed me what real work is. She had been raised as poor as poor gets in northern rural Minnesota; farm people who dig at ice and pray it grows food. At 15 she ran away from home to Minneapolis; two days into that unimagineably big city and she had herself a full-time job as a secretary: She looked 18, was deadly beautiful, and smarter than any four people combined. And she knew enough about how the world worked to start making it work for her for a change.

She must have been around 30 when she married my dad in 1968. When they met, my dad was already divorced from my mother. He was a Big Deal Actor in the San Francisco Bay Area, which even then was famous for the quality and diversity of its regional theater. He was a leading leading man, looking majestically cool in his black turtlenecks and sideburns; she was — as people who were in their 30’s in 1968 still tended to think of it — a real bombshell.

She took an acting class he was teaching, and was smitten.

“The minute I saw your father,” she once told me, “I swooned. Swooned! I simply could not believe my eyes. He was the most gorgeous man I’d ever seen.” She pulled in her breath. “And when I found out he was single?” She stared at me, meaning to convey the enormity of her incredulity, and I saw flashing in her eyes that same resolve that had once set her walking away from her family’s land toward a life she knew could only be better. “Well,” she said, “I knew that was going to end. I said to myself, ‘Annie, that man is going to be your husband.’”

Within a year my dad had a new wife, my sister and me a new mother.

Literally, too: My dad and his new wife legally adopted my sister and me: in a day, they became to whom we came home from school.

My sister left our Home 2.0 when she was 15 years old. I lasted until I was seventeen.

Nobody’s fault. Life is hard. Things happen. We all spin like crazy from hits we never even saw coming.

Once I left my house I didn’t have much contact with my father or stepmother for the next 20 or so years. Then (at 38) I became a Christian — and so became a generally kinder, more patient person. So I began writing my dad and Ann letters. After a while they invited my wife and me out to their home. So we went, and spent a week with them.

It was a trip. I had become a stranger to my own father–and to the woman who had basically been my mother for seven or so years. But we all had a lovely time; my parents and I weren’t, after all, total strangers.

And my wife cracked my dad up — my dad, who spent his life making others laugh. Whom no one is funnier than.

It’s a fine thing, to watch your father gazing at your wife with love and respect. Watching him watching her that way engendered in me a combination of emotions I had not known before.

My wife and I visited them again the following year. That was the last time we saw my step-mother.

She called me, for the first time ever, about a year ago. She had read my book, “Penguins, Pain and the Whole Shebang: Why I Do the Things I Do,” by God (as told to John Shore.) She wanted me to know that the book had awakened in her a desire to go to church. She sounded like maybe she was crying — except she was also clearly joyous. She sounded like a little girl.

“I can just go to church, can’t I?” she said. “Just to go?”

“Of course you can,” I said. “Of course.”

“It would be a start, wouldn’t it?” she asked, laughing.

Writing: Don’t Get Me Started

In HowTo, Writing on January 10, 2008 at 10:38 am

I’ve been astounded by how many people have read my “How To Make a Living Writing,” and “How To Make a Living Writing, Part Two.” The tone and tenor of the comments left on those posts is truly gratifying. (I wish I had more time to respond to them, but lately I’ve been eyeball deep in a 60,000 book that’s due in about a week [!] and has been devouring my time like the Cookie Monster on a mallomar.)

You know what’s weird? I’m in the book business, right? So my life, and the lives of everyone around me, are about book ideas. The Holy Grail of publishers, agents, and authors is The Great Book Idea. It’s all any of us want. It’s what we live on and for. The better the idea for a book, the better that book’s chances for becoming a bestseller. (Failing that, what you want if you’re a publisher is a huge name on the front of your book. But that’s a whole other … trip.)

This is how valuable book ideas are: I’ve had two of them flat-out, no question, bold/bald-faced stolen from me. One was stolen by an agent (who gave my idea and the manuscript in which I’d developed it to one of his better known clients), and the other stolen from a major publisher (who never returned or responded to my inquiries about the 25,000-word proposal I’d sent them, and then, the following season, came out , under the name of a Famous Comedian, my exact book: same title, subtitle, back jacket copy, introduction, chapter headings, chapter content … all of it, just as I’d written it).

In the book business (as in all writing, as in life, come to think of it) ideas are the currency. It took me forever to realize that. I always thought ideas were just … nothing, basically. Insubstantial potentialities. Fleeting inspirations. Fun ways to combine opposing or complementary realities. Acknowledgments of obvious (or, in a pinch, teased out) possibilities. Latencies simply spoken into form. I always figured ideas were utterly … free for the picking, basically.

Man. Wrong. Turns out they’re everything.

Anyway, it’s obvious enough from the extremo response I’ve gotten from my last couple of blogs that I’ve stumbled onto a bonafide Book Idea. How that can be is a complete mystery: If there’s anything in this world I figure there’s enough of, it’s flippin’ books on how to be a flippin’ writer. I hate books on how to be a writer. I just can’t read them. I find them like chewing a huge wad of flavorless gum: bothersome, no nutrition, threatens to choke you to death, can’t swallow it. The whole industry that makes money off of people’s desire to be famous writers drives me crazy. I hate it. It’s so … smarmy and exploitative.

Not all of it, of course. I’m sure a lot of it is sincere and wonderful. I love what I’ve read of Stephen King’s book on writing.

All that said, I have long intended to myself write a book on writing. Like the gay-bashing pastor who secretly dreams of calling 1-800-MAN HANDS, I’ve always wanted to go there. There’s so much I’d really like to say about the whole “I want to be a writer” dynamic. But I always thought I’d write that book at the end of my career, when anyone would have any reason whatsoever to really care what I think about writing.

And yet, here I am. Just on the strength of how many people read my last two blogs, I could now sell a book on writing. ”The Last Writing Book You’ll Need,” might be a title. ”Get Right With Writing.” ”Righting Your Writing.” “Righteous Writing.” (I’m now trained to think first about a book’s title, since a book’s title is about everything to a publisher. Serious business. I’ve had publishers tell me that if a book of mine they’d previously turned down had come to them bearing the same title under which it was ultimately published, they’d have published it themselves. You can sell a book with just a title. Watch: someone will come out with a book called “Righteous Writing.”)

Anyway, just now I’m not going to write a book on writing. You know why? You know why I was always going to write that book at the end of my career? Because the reason people sell books about writing is because such books are grounded in the idea that the people buying and reading them really can become successful writers. (And just what “successful writer” actually means is of course all over the board.) Such books feed on that aspiration. But the terrible, undeniable truth is that almost no one is really good at writing.

Our culture has such a weird relationship with writers. On the one hand we revere our best writers: people get breathless just saying the name “Shakespeare” or “Hemingway.” (I personally get breathless saying “Twain” or “Fitzgerald.”) And yet at the same time, everyone thinks they’re a writer. Our best writers spend their lives as absolute, abject slaves to the genuine art of writing — yet every scarf-wearing, cappuccino-sipping doink you see writing in a journal at a coffee shop thinks the only thing standing between them and writing fame is luck.

Yikes. I see I’m bordering on the Crazed Harangue. Sorry.

And actually, of course, my heart is with the journaling doink. That j.d. is My Kind! I’m with anyone who ever attempts to put clear, compelling thought into words. I’ve spent my entire life learning how to do exactly nothing but that. It’s so stupid. I’m 49, and the only thing I know how to do is construct a decent sentence. Should come in real handy next major earthquake, or whatever.

Anyway, this is what I’m saying: I know that if I really told that person journaling in the coffee shop what they were really going to have to do with their mind, life, heart, and soul in order to become a real writer, they’d slam their journal shut faster than they could say, “Yo, man, you’re hurting my arm. “